Catchy title? Well, it got your attention right? I had to write about this because I feel so strongly about this. Webmasters have been talking for a few months now about new tactics and strategies Google has announced that they will soon or may already be putting into practice. The first was telling webmasters that they will penalize for “paid links” found or reported on websites. Matt Cutts wrote on his blog how Google will begin to provide a place for people to report paid links to Google that they find on websites, or if they say on the websites that someone is willing to sell links. This will now be taboo and could penalize your website.
Secondly, as I previously talked about, Google AdSense publishers were given their pink slips, so to say, for having MFA websites or sites that “did not have suitable business models” and given two weeks notice to find a replacement for the advertising.
Now back to the title… you’re asking, “OK, Kim so how does this make them hypocrites?” Simple, they do the exact opposite of their own new rules. Let’s go through it one at a time.
First “No paid Links” what does Googles AdWords program do? Basically they take peoples paid per click ads and throw them throughout all of AdSense publishers websites. Wouldn’t this be the same as a paid link? I think so. Google is making a killing in ad revenue because I, as a webmaster of more then 50 websites, allow them to place their paid ads throughout my sites. Not convinced yet? Ok, moving on
Here are the ways they feel that they can determine if any link on websites is paid for:
1. Links Labeled as Advertisements
Question, what is labeled next to each Google ad displayed on my page and other websites? Answer: “Ads by Google”
2. Site Wide Links
Hmmmm. Take a look through most website that use AdSense and you will see ads on every page. Yah, because we are trying to take advantage of making more money but increasing exposure.
3. Links that are Sold By a Link Agency
How is AdWords any different then a link agency? When I used AdWords, and I haven’t in a long time wasted my money on it, I got links from all the sites that displayed my ads therefore it could be considered a linking strategy.
4. Selling Site has Information on How to Buy a Text Link Ad
If Google is allow to make money by selling the top results of their search engine, why am I also not allow to make ad revenue on my own sites also?
5. Relevance of Your Link
Don’t even get me started with this. Google AdWords is so riddled with MFA sites even the ads they throw on my sites are not relevant. I personally only except relevant websites, but I think Google should do more to ensure that their own ads are relevant to my site and not full of spammy MFA sites.
6. Relevance of Nearby Links
What if the nearby link happens to be relevant to the content but not relevant to the other link in there according to their bot? I think this concept can be easily flawed and unreliable to judge for a robot.
7. Advertising Location and Type
Ad placement should be left up to the webmaster. Where are Google ads typically placed? Most people place them in left or right columns and top of the page. Google claims that these places will be where most sold links would be and will discount them. Will they discount their own ads I have on my page in those areas, or just my partners ads?
8. Someone Reports Your Site for Buying Links
Since the announcement of Google looking for webmasters to report paid links sold on websites webmasters have been outraged at this, for good reason. So who would report your website of these webmasters? Your competition, of course! Therefore it may become an all out war amongst competitors to report each other, accomplishing nothing of relevance.
9. Someone Reports Your Site for Some Other Reason
I think anyone who is not a webmaster really has little knowledge of Google workings and wouldn’t even know about reporting a site, therefore, most liking this will also become abused by a competitor again.
10. Someone Reports the Site you Bought Links from for Selling Links
Competitors reporting each other could therefore cause a domino effect. For example, if abc.com reports nbc.com for buying a link on xyz.com Google may then begin investigating who else has bought links from xyz.com causing a domino effect for sites. More importantly (try to stay with me here) what if another website on xyz.com did NOT buy the link but was linked there naturally as a resource for the clients and then they get tangled in the mess and reported for paid links?
The list goes on but the one thing is obvious, if Google truly imposes these types of restrictions on webmaster it is completely hypocritical! It should not be allowed that Google can penalize ANY webmaster for making ad revenue on their websites in the same means that Google itself is thriving on ad revenue. As a webmaster I am forced to constantly figure out new ways to improve my search engine position with Google’s every changing algorithm and this is enough work. Now I typically consider what is best for my clients first on my website and search engines are second, but the truth is you always have to considerate search engines or no one will find your site.
This new tactic by Google is not only hypocritical, in my opinion, it is also going to possible stray money I earn trying to make money with my own business. Google always seems to fail to remember without us webmasters they would not exist, so maybe they should stop considering their bottom-line all the time and take care of those putting money in their pockets!